Child tells the social worker and everyone else "Daddy made me lick his penis".
Days later child is removed and put into complete isolation from mom, siblings, family, church, school and extracurricular activities. She can not speak to mom or rest of the family via phone or skype. She is not allowed to give her homework to her mom. She is not allowed even the smallest courtesy of her own clothes. Instead the state buys them and bills the mom while returning a bag of perfect even fashionable clothes. Next they may as well slide food under her cell door. Better not give them ideas. It seems harsher than even prison. Since in prison your allowed money for vending on your card. Your allowed visitors and phone calls. Your allowed to speak without sanction as long as respectable.
So conclusion Foster Care in some places in Michigan is worse than prison for murderers.
The child has been given some agreement, that is in question. Child stated "I didn't break our deal" when social worker enters room because child whispered something private about needing to go to bathroom. Child also says " I can't hug you mommy or I have to hug him"(pedo dad who made 6 yo child lick his penis). Why would anyone force a child to hug someone like that? What kind of deal? Why is it not known by all parties? Seems like blackmail if they told child she cant see mommy if she says daddy made her do oral sex. Maybe that's what they said because child is even more fearful now.
Child has begged and begged to come home. They wouldn't even think about Christmas letting her go. Funny thing is the only evidence they had for removing child was that mom had a bad psych evaluation 3 years ago.She had good one too but for some reason that doesn't count.Who decides what counts? In my eyes a bad and good balance each other out.
The state law on removing child into foster care says you must have exhausted all efforts for reunification~ Odd since the week before they asked mom's attorney to extend supervised order to keep child safe from dad. When did they even tell mom looking at her as suspect ? When did they tell her there was a problem? When did they ask her about psych eval? In fact they never did and they never did reunification!! So they broke the law? Judges are allowed to break laws? I never saw that in the constitution!
Due process is in constitution though!
Social worker blatantly lied! She perjured herself and even proves it in her very own report! So all it would take is for the judge to read her report and he would see the lies. Do judges read? Hmm, law school requires reading. Therefore judge either can't read or can't hear or doesn't care as he is as corrupt as sugar is sweet.
Child has drawn explicit sexual drawings for therapist alone with no parent in room.Therapist was licensed by social services to interview children to evaluate if abused. Somehow his opinion about said child was not good enough and he was let go.Why is his evaluation good when its other children but not this child? Maybe they don't want child to tell truth about sexual abuse. Why, Is dad powerful? Is he scary? Has he blackmailed them or paid them off? So a child suffers because CPS is corrupted!
Sexually explicit drawings are not done by 6 year old children who are not abused in some form.
Child sees yellow lip gloss and freezes. Child says "that looks like daddy's penis looks like this but its brown not yellow." Wow, in my whole life I have never heard how lip gloss looks like a penis. It does though now that I think of it. Why would a child who has allegedly never been abused think that when they see a simple thing like lip gloss.
Dad raped one woman in car with child present!
Dad has two members who are sex offenders already. In my mind I see a puzzle that fits clearly Do you see what I see?
Dad was caught naked in bed with 10 month old ! Why? What kind of man crawls in bed naked with a baby?
Child says Daddy slaps me there! Hmm toddler points to vagina and says this. Why is he touching or slapping there?
Children do not lie about abuse because they do not want to talk about it let alone give details!
Children can not keep lies straight.
Children do not know sexual words and descriptions unless they have seen them.
This mom has raised 4 perfectly healthy children with her ex.They have all graduated college and married healthy spouses. It was not a perfect divorce but they shared children and looked out for them above all!
Why would this child lie? She wouldn't!
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
Sunday, December 22, 2013
What's Wrong with this Picture? Dr. Sharon Ryan Montgomery
What's Wrong with this Picture? Dr. Sharon Ryan Montgomery, that's what!
Dr. Sharon Ryan Montgomery along with others, and with the support of the entire NJ-AFCC has written a pamphlet called: Family First Aid, Evaluation and Settlement-Based Approaches for Families in Confict.
Here is an excerpt
"Visitation Refusual Evaluation
Description: This type of evaluation attempts to assess the extent of and underlying causes of a child’s refusal to visit a parent.
Who Performs the Evaluation:
These evaluations are performed by a licensed mental health professionals (e.g. clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, or psychiatrists) who have expertise in working with families of divorce, and have a background in child development family systems, as well as some working knowledge of family law. This professional should be familiar with the concept of alienation."
WHAT IS THE NJ-AFCC AND WHAT IS THE "CONCEPT OF ALIENATION?"
The AFCC is the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts. The group is heavily tied in with the mens rights movement. If you are not sure what the mens rights movement is, just think about having a cup of tea, at a party, in the extreme right wing of some mansion. That is what we would stereotypically think anyway. Truth is they are in both major parties and in your neighborhoods. They are the ones who think sex with children is not sick as long as they are your own children and/or other beliefs along that line. The AFCC was formed to preserve the core of our country, the stereotypical family with the father as the head. This leads us right to the gender biased role of "alienation".
Alienation has been a legal term a long time, in fact alienation of affection used to be grounds for a divorce. This "concept of alienation" has different roots that go deep in family law history. Richard Gardner developed the theory of parental alienation a long time ago. He held classes for the judges and other members of the AFCC on his theory. He believed that women, could brain wash their children and turn them against their fathers. In cases of domestic violence, the Gardner playing field was either a father was a perpetrator of domestic violence or the mother was guilty of parental alienation. Over time with all the womens rights hubbub some of Gardners followers have tried to water it down to make it apply to both sexes. It doesn't work because the original version is what is known.
Professionally this parental alienation syndrome and whatever shortened versions of the name one would want to use, is crappe'. The APA did not include it in the DSM and have classified it as "junk science" In the legal realm it is considered Junk science too. When the Frye test was the legal standard, parental alienation did not pass that test. Now it is the Daubert test and parental alienation hasn't passed that either. We really can't expect much to come from a man who believes pedophilia is normal, now can we? (Richard Gardner).
In this day and time, why do we have sexist "professionals" such as Dr. Sharon Ryan Montgomery in a position to take our children away? Please take a moment to Bing that S**t, read all sides of the issues and then decide.
If you don't want this woman in a position to decide the fate of your children you can send a letter to
J. Michael Walker, Executive Director, Board of Psychological Examiners, PO Box 45017, Newark, NJ 07101
Dr. Sharon Ryan Montgomery along with others, and with the support of the entire NJ-AFCC has written a pamphlet called: Family First Aid, Evaluation and Settlement-Based Approaches for Families in Confict.
Here is an excerpt
"Visitation Refusual Evaluation
Description: This type of evaluation attempts to assess the extent of and underlying causes of a child’s refusal to visit a parent.
Who Performs the Evaluation:
These evaluations are performed by a licensed mental health professionals (e.g. clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, or psychiatrists) who have expertise in working with families of divorce, and have a background in child development family systems, as well as some working knowledge of family law. This professional should be familiar with the concept of alienation."
WHAT IS THE NJ-AFCC AND WHAT IS THE "CONCEPT OF ALIENATION?"
The AFCC is the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts. The group is heavily tied in with the mens rights movement. If you are not sure what the mens rights movement is, just think about having a cup of tea, at a party, in the extreme right wing of some mansion. That is what we would stereotypically think anyway. Truth is they are in both major parties and in your neighborhoods. They are the ones who think sex with children is not sick as long as they are your own children and/or other beliefs along that line. The AFCC was formed to preserve the core of our country, the stereotypical family with the father as the head. This leads us right to the gender biased role of "alienation".
Alienation has been a legal term a long time, in fact alienation of affection used to be grounds for a divorce. This "concept of alienation" has different roots that go deep in family law history. Richard Gardner developed the theory of parental alienation a long time ago. He held classes for the judges and other members of the AFCC on his theory. He believed that women, could brain wash their children and turn them against their fathers. In cases of domestic violence, the Gardner playing field was either a father was a perpetrator of domestic violence or the mother was guilty of parental alienation. Over time with all the womens rights hubbub some of Gardners followers have tried to water it down to make it apply to both sexes. It doesn't work because the original version is what is known.
Professionally this parental alienation syndrome and whatever shortened versions of the name one would want to use, is crappe'. The APA did not include it in the DSM and have classified it as "junk science" In the legal realm it is considered Junk science too. When the Frye test was the legal standard, parental alienation did not pass that test. Now it is the Daubert test and parental alienation hasn't passed that either. We really can't expect much to come from a man who believes pedophilia is normal, now can we? (Richard Gardner).
In this day and time, why do we have sexist "professionals" such as Dr. Sharon Ryan Montgomery in a position to take our children away? Please take a moment to Bing that S**t, read all sides of the issues and then decide.
If you don't want this woman in a position to decide the fate of your children you can send a letter to
J. Michael Walker, Executive Director, Board of Psychological Examiners, PO Box 45017, Newark, NJ 07101
Since when do degrees make you a judge?
Dr.Sharon Ryan Montgomery holds a PsyD degree in New Jersey. Is that enough to recommend custody issues? Take a peek! Looks like in this case a psychologist was competing with a judge for power. Will New Jersey replace their judges with psychologists?
I have quoted portions of the case, if you wish to read the entire case you can google: DEBORAH WEISS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERIC S. WEISS, Defendant-Appellant. DOCKET NO. A-1470-09T2 -- November 24, 2010
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. DEBORAH WEISS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERIC S. WEISS, Defendant-Appellant. DOCKET NO. A-1470-09T2 -- November 24, 2010
"...The trial court ruled implicitly that the best interests of the children required a modified and simpler parenting schedule to reduce the parental disputes, to reduce the motion practice, and to reduce the children's strife and stress. The ruling was contrary to the opinion of the parenting time expert, Dr. Montgomery, who concluded that absence from their father for seven days would not be in the best interests of the children. There was not sufficient credible evidence in the record to support the reduction in defendant's parenting time to a level Dr. Montgomery believed was not in the best interests of the children.
Parental rights to custody and visitation are held “in high esteem” and are guaranteed judicial protection. Wilke v. Culp, 196 N.J.Super. 487, 496 (App.Div.1984), certif. denied, 99 N.J. 243 (1985). Our courts are committed to the principle that “children of separated parents should be imbued with love and respect for both parents, and where children are in [the] custody of one parent, the court should endeavor to effect this facet of the children's welfare by conferring reasonable rights of visitation on the other parent.” Ibid.
“[T]he matter of visitation is so important, especially during the formative years of a child, that if a plenary hearing will better enable a court to fashion a plan of visitation more commensurate with a child's welfare, it should require it.” Wagner v. Wagner, 165 N.J.Super. 553, 555 (App.Div.1979), certif. denied, 85 N.J. 93 (1980). Resolution of parenting time should not be made on the basis of conflicting certifications and an otherwise insufficient record. See Fusco v. Fusco, 186 N.J.Super. 321, 327-29 (App.Div.1982).
Where the parties' certifications are conflicting, and where a proposed modification to a parenting schedule partially contradicts the “best interests” opinion of the sole parenting time expert, a plenary hearing before reducing parenting time will usually be required. In light of those considerations, a plenary hearing should have been conducted..." (This case was remanded back on the parenting time issue)
If you have had problems with Dr. Sharon Ryan Montgomery, you can complain to the licensing board by contacting J. Michael Walker, Executive Director, Board of Psychological Examiners, PO Box 45017, Newark, NJ 07101, (973) 504-6470 or visit the website
http://www.state.nj.us/lps/ca/psy/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)